Reading Horizons
   
Social Media
Success Story
"The students complete the program feeling comfortable with words and taking more difficult assignments with some self-confidence, where there was little or none before they began."
— Amy Maxwell, High Desert State Prison, California

California Department of Corrections

California Department of Corrections

Scope of Work

Reading Horizons was selected by California State University from among 24 other bids for use in the California Inmate Literacy Project (1994—1997). The following results describe the full three-year evaluation. Inmates enrolled in Reading Horizons included ESL students testing at or below the fourth-grade reading level upon entry.

California Inmate Literacy Project (1994-1997). The data available show inmates made noticeable progress in this program. The results were surprising, since the majority of inmates were learning English as a Second Language.

Tool

The WRAT (Wide Range Achievement Test)

Time Frame

Three-year study conducted between 1994-1997

Data

  # of Inmates Entry Grade Current Grade Grade Gain
Avenal State Prison 48 5.2 8.1 2.9
California Correctional Instutiton, Tehachapi 10 5.7 9.8 4.1
California Medical Facility, Vacaville 1 2.1 4.3 2.2
California Men's Colony, San Luis Obispo 38 8.4 9.5 1.2
California Rehabilitation Center, Norco 25 5.5 5.9 0.4
California State Prison, Corcoran 1 2.4 3.4 1.0
California State Prison, Los Angeles County 11 7.9 9.5 1.6
California State Prison, Solano 36 5.3 7.7 3.0
California State Prison 10 2.2 4.4 2.2
Central California Women's Facility, Chowchilla 4 2.6 4.9 2.3
Chuckwalla Valley State Prison, Blythe 39 5.7 8.2 2.5
Correctional Training Facility, Soledad 12 3.7 6.7 3.0
Deuel Vocational Institute, Tracy 67 3.6 5.5 1.9
Folsom State Prison 35 5.1 7.5 4.3
Ironwood State Prison, Blythe 24 4.5 5.0 0.5
Mule Creek State Prison, Ione 21 7.3 11.3 4.0
North Kern State Prison, Delano 3 4.0 3.4 -0.6
R. J. Donovan Correction Facility, San Diego 11 3.7 5.0 1.3
Wasco State Prison 4 2.1 4.2 2.1
Averages & Totals 400 5.2 7.3 2.1

Grade Gains by Racial and Ethnic Background

In this program, Hispanics, the largest group, made the greatest gains, followed by Asian inmates. Black inmates, the second-largest group, achieved an average grade gain of 1.7. It should be noted that the number of Native American and Asian inmates is so small that the results are not generalized.

Racial and Ethnic Background Number of Inmates Pre-test Post-test Grade Gain
American Indian 1 4.2 4.2 0.0
Asian 6 4.0 6.0 2.0
Black 74 4.9 6.6 1.7
Hispanic 270 5.4 7.8 2.4
White 17 4.2 5.7 1.5
Other 31 5.5 5.9 0.4
Averages & Totals 400 5.2 7.3 2.1

Evaluator's Observations

  • By institution, the gains made by the inmates ranged from -0.6 to 4.3 grades.
  • On average, inmates for whom both pre- and post-test scores are available exhibit a 2.1 grade gain.
  • Student progress was remarkable.
Printable Version
Get Adobe Reader

You will need the free Adobe Reader to read this document.

 
   
feedback button